The best resolution a telescope on earth can see on the moon is 300ft across, the rover is alot smaller than that, so you would not be able to see it, even the satellite which took pictures of the landing sites form lunar orbit showed little more than dots that were the landers ect
A thought for you conspiracy theorists out there in the comments.
The moon landing was supposed to be one of those big ego things between the US and the Soviets back in the day. If it was faked…why haven’t the Russians been running around proving it was a lie? Plenty of pride for them if they show that the US couldn’t do what they boasted, right?
Kind of funny how rival intelligence agencies couldn’t bring counter-evidence to the landings, but a bunch of people on the net supposedly can.
There is no telescope on earth powerful enough to resolve an object that small a quarter of a million miles away.
It has been imaged from lunar orbit, but that is it.
Ok, maybe my explanation of it was wrong in how it works, its been close to 20 years since I’ve been to that telescope. However, the fact remains that I did see an image of the lunar rover on the moon. Oh wait, that was faked by nasa too right? GG to ya’ll.
According to NOAA Major Solar Flares occurred on every faked apollo mission except 16.
Jan Lundberg from Hasselblad, the maker of the still nasa camera said the moon landing pictures
were a hoax because the camera used had no viewfinder, and the fake pictures had more than one light source.
HJP Arnold, of Kodak who supplied the Ektachrome film for the fake missions
said, ” They had to effectively guess where they were pointing the camera.”
They showed how in this video.
On a perfectly flat level the shadows were parallel, then the small rocks were raised on a small mound.
As the shadow then lay on a different plane to that of the LM they appeared to be no longer parallel.
It does also however vary depending on the position of the camera as well as the focal length of the camera.
Moonlandings Filmed on planet EARTH
AREA 51 dreamlandresortdotcom
Directed by Kubrik
Written by von BRaun the Nazi
Produced by the US NWO Govt
and Disney (mickey mouse) Productions
Area 51 in nevada desert is were the fake moon landing took place, soviet satellite spy photos of area 51 revealed a series of hangers that resembled movie sound stages and
also barren moon like areas which are covered with craters.
’sonar’,
Now that is hilarious.
Cheers for the laugh; but that is a nice piece of fiction.
There is really no need to make up ‘facts’ when there is so much evidence that they did go.
Yes, I have ’seen’ a rover through a ‘radio’ telescope. It uses radio waves like a sonar to acquire images that would not be visable to the naked eye even with a good telescope.
Either way, you guys need to find a new hobby besides looking for hoaxes around every corner.
lol he just made a moon landscape with cement
I love Mythbuster but guys!!!!!!!!
Comon we all know that man never set foot on the moon!
How much did NASA pay you guys?
maybe the money was to good to be truthful about what really went down.
probably slipped them some acid in their space food stix, or maybe laced the tang with the same.
so what abt Neil amrstrong&Buzz ??
all they have been claiming through their entire life………………??
@dudefromtherock
lol well said
mythbusters are morons
nasa paid propaganda whores
Astronauts on the Fake Apollo Missions
were drugged out of their minds
Art Bell to Astronaut Mitchell,,, “What did it feel like to walk on the moon? What were you feeling emotionally?
Mitchell,,,, ” I can’t remember”
Interviewer,,, “Did you feel the ill effects from the Van Allen Radiation belt? ”
Alan Bean,,, ” I’m not sure we went far out enough to encounter the Radiation belts, i don’t know the distance to the radiation belt”
What’s funny here is by debunking the photo myth they prove how easy it is to fake the moon landing…nice try guys! Busted!
The best resolution a telescope on earth can see on the moon is 300ft across, the rover is alot smaller than that, so you would not be able to see it, even the satellite which took pictures of the landing sites form lunar orbit showed little more than dots that were the landers ect
A thought for you conspiracy theorists out there in the comments.
The moon landing was supposed to be one of those big ego things between the US and the Soviets back in the day. If it was faked…why haven’t the Russians been running around proving it was a lie? Plenty of pride for them if they show that the US couldn’t do what they boasted, right?
Kind of funny how rival intelligence agencies couldn’t bring counter-evidence to the landings, but a bunch of people on the net supposedly can.
There is no telescope on earth powerful enough to resolve an object that small a quarter of a million miles away.
It has been imaged from lunar orbit, but that is it.
Ok, maybe my explanation of it was wrong in how it works, its been close to 20 years since I’ve been to that telescope. However, the fact remains that I did see an image of the lunar rover on the moon. Oh wait, that was faked by nasa too right? GG to ya’ll.
*walks away with his head shaking*
NASA FAIRY TALES
According to NOAA Major Solar Flares occurred on every faked apollo mission except 16.
Jan Lundberg from Hasselblad, the maker of the still nasa camera said the moon landing pictures
were a hoax because the camera used had no viewfinder, and the fake pictures had more than one light source.
HJP Arnold, of Kodak who supplied the Ektachrome film for the fake missions
said, ” They had to effectively guess where they were pointing the camera.”
Myhtbusters are Morons
Nasa Paid Propaganda Whores
Fake science for 10 year olds
They showed how in this video.
On a perfectly flat level the shadows were parallel, then the small rocks were raised on a small mound.
As the shadow then lay on a different plane to that of the LM they appeared to be no longer parallel.
It does also however vary depending on the position of the camera as well as the focal length of the camera.
@ytmoog
i ment in detail. all they did is say how it is done not actually show.
not taking sides. just curious.
They did.
It is down to terrain and perspective.
would be interesting if they showed how they made the shadows appear and 2 different angles.
@tanis143
LOL radio telescopes are passive, ie they only recieve they dont transmit. try again.
ytmoog is a shill propaganda whore schoolkid
Mythbusters are Nasa paid propaganists
APOLLO FAKED MOONLANDINGS
Moonlandings Filmed on planet EARTH
AREA 51 dreamlandresortdotcom
Directed by Kubrik
Written by von BRaun the Nazi
Produced by the US NWO Govt
and Disney (mickey mouse) Productions
Area 51 in nevada desert is were the fake moon landing took place, soviet satellite spy photos of area 51 revealed a series of hangers that resembled movie sound stages and
also barren moon like areas which are covered with craters.
’sonar’,
Now that is hilarious.
Cheers for the laugh; but that is a nice piece of fiction.
There is really no need to make up ‘facts’ when there is so much evidence that they did go.
They have more then one light source in their studio most probably they are paid by NASA
Yes, I have ’seen’ a rover through a ‘radio’ telescope. It uses radio waves like a sonar to acquire images that would not be visable to the naked eye even with a good telescope.
Either way, you guys need to find a new hobby besides looking for hoaxes around every corner.