Mythbusters Moon Landing photo hoax 1

Written by admin on February 8th, 2010


Debunking “Multiple light sources” myth.

 

25 Comments so far ↓

  1. nadenitza says:

    lol he just made a moon landscape with cement :)

  2. atlantis2egypt says:

    I love Mythbuster but guys!!!!!!!!
    Comon we all know that man never set foot on the moon!

    How much did NASA pay you guys?

  3. bushuraloser says:

    maybe the money was to good to be truthful about what really went down.

  4. bushuraloser says:

    probably slipped them some acid in their space food stix, or maybe laced the tang with the same.

  5. smartanu18 says:

    so what abt Neil amrstrong&Buzz ??
    all they have been claiming through their entire life………………??

  6. nasafakedit says:

    @dudefromtherock

    lol well said
    mythbusters are morons
    nasa paid propaganda whores

  7. nasafakedit says:

    Astronauts on the Fake Apollo Missions
    were drugged out of their minds

    Art Bell to Astronaut Mitchell,,, “What did it feel like to walk on the moon? What were you feeling emotionally?

    Mitchell,,,, ” I can’t remember”

    Interviewer,,, “Did you feel the ill effects from the Van Allen Radiation belt? ”

    Alan Bean,,, ” I’m not sure we went far out enough to encounter the Radiation belts, i don’t know the distance to the radiation belt”

  8. dudefromtherock says:

    What’s funny here is by debunking the photo myth they prove how easy it is to fake the moon landing…nice try guys! Busted!

  9. musicbruv says:

    The best resolution a telescope on earth can see on the moon is 300ft across, the rover is alot smaller than that, so you would not be able to see it, even the satellite which took pictures of the landing sites form lunar orbit showed little more than dots that were the landers ect

  10. subtlewhatssubtle says:

    A thought for you conspiracy theorists out there in the comments.

    The moon landing was supposed to be one of those big ego things between the US and the Soviets back in the day. If it was faked…why haven’t the Russians been running around proving it was a lie? Plenty of pride for them if they show that the US couldn’t do what they boasted, right?

    Kind of funny how rival intelligence agencies couldn’t bring counter-evidence to the landings, but a bunch of people on the net supposedly can.

  11. ytmoog says:

    There is no telescope on earth powerful enough to resolve an object that small a quarter of a million miles away.
    It has been imaged from lunar orbit, but that is it.

  12. tanis143 says:

    Ok, maybe my explanation of it was wrong in how it works, its been close to 20 years since I’ve been to that telescope. However, the fact remains that I did see an image of the lunar rover on the moon. Oh wait, that was faked by nasa too right? GG to ya’ll.

    *walks away with his head shaking*

  13. nasafakedit says:

    NASA FAIRY TALES

    According to NOAA Major Solar Flares occurred on every faked apollo mission except 16.

    Jan Lundberg from Hasselblad, the maker of the still nasa camera said the moon landing pictures
    were a hoax because the camera used had no viewfinder, and the fake pictures had more than one light source.

    HJP Arnold, of Kodak who supplied the Ektachrome film for the fake missions
    said, ” They had to effectively guess where they were pointing the camera.”

  14. nasafakedit says:

    Myhtbusters are Morons

    Nasa Paid Propaganda Whores

    Fake science for 10 year olds

  15. ytmoog says:

    They showed how in this video.
    On a perfectly flat level the shadows were parallel, then the small rocks were raised on a small mound.
    As the shadow then lay on a different plane to that of the LM they appeared to be no longer parallel.

    It does also however vary depending on the position of the camera as well as the focal length of the camera.

  16. Godsfirstborn says:

    @ytmoog

    i ment in detail. all they did is say how it is done not actually show.

    not taking sides. just curious.

  17. ytmoog says:

    They did.
    It is down to terrain and perspective.

  18. Godsfirstborn says:

    would be interesting if they showed how they made the shadows appear and 2 different angles.

  19. musicbruv says:

    @tanis143
    LOL radio telescopes are passive, ie they only recieve they dont transmit. try again.

  20. nasafakedit says:

    ytmoog is a shill propaganda whore schoolkid

  21. nasafakedit says:

    Mythbusters are Nasa paid propaganists

  22. nasafakedit says:

    APOLLO FAKED MOONLANDINGS

    Moonlandings Filmed on planet EARTH
    AREA 51 dreamlandresortdotcom
    Directed by Kubrik
    Written by von BRaun the Nazi
    Produced by the US NWO Govt
    and Disney (mickey mouse) Productions

    Area 51 in nevada desert is were the fake moon landing took place, soviet satellite spy photos of area 51 revealed a series of hangers that resembled movie sound stages and
    also barren moon like areas which are covered with craters.

  23. ytmoog says:

    ’sonar’,
    Now that is hilarious.
    Cheers for the laugh; but that is a nice piece of fiction.
    There is really no need to make up ‘facts’ when there is so much evidence that they did go.

  24. davidshaz20000 says:

    They have more then one light source in their studio most probably they are paid by NASA

  25. tanis143 says:

    Yes, I have ’seen’ a rover through a ‘radio’ telescope. It uses radio waves like a sonar to acquire images that would not be visable to the naked eye even with a good telescope.

    Either way, you guys need to find a new hobby besides looking for hoaxes around every corner.

Leave a Comment





Security Code:

Powered by Yahoo! Answers